What is a tamper evident NFC tag?
A tag built so that removing it breaks the antenna, so a peeled tag stops working rather than being reusable elsewhere. It proves this tag has not been moved. It does not prove the content is genuine, and conflating those two is the usual mistake.
How they work
The antenna is bonded to the surface more strongly than it is held together. Lifting the tag tears the conductor, which opens the loop.
An open loop collects no energy, so the removed tag is inert. There is no partial function and no way to reassemble it.
Some constructions also leave a visible mark on the tag or the surface, which gives a human check alongside the electronic one.
The mechanism is destructive by design, which means these tags are single use in a sense ordinary tags are not. A tag applied to the wrong spot is a wasted tag.
What it proves
That this physical tag is still where it was applied. A tag that reads has not been peeled off, because peeling it would have ended it.
That is a genuinely useful property. It closes the substitution attack where someone lifts a tag from one item and applies it to another, which is otherwise trivial.
Combined with a record of which identifier belongs at which location, it also lets you detect a tag that has been added rather than moved.
What it does not prove
That the content is authentic. Anyone can read the tag and write the same content to a blank one, then stick that blank one nearby. The copy works, and it is not tamper evident about anything.
That the item is genuine. The tag attests to itself, not to what it is attached to.
That nothing was covered. Placing a second tag over the first does not disturb the first at all, and a reader may answer to the new one.
Where authenticity genuinely matters, the mechanism is a chip that authenticates cryptographically, which proves to your server that it is the tag it claims to be. A copy holding identical content fails that check because it cannot produce the proof.
Using them properly
Record which identifier is at which location before deployment. Without that record, tamper evidence tells you a tag is present and nothing about whether it is the right one.
Apply once, carefully. The destructive mechanism means repositioning is not an option, so plan the placement before peeling the liner.
Check the surface. Tamper evidence relies on the bond to the surface being stronger than the tag, and a dusty or low energy surface breaks that assumption in the attacker's favour.
And decide what happens when a tag stops reading. Tamper evidence only helps if a missing response triggers something, so a deployment that never notices a dead tag has bought nothing.
Frequently asked questions
Can a tamper evident tag be removed intact by an expert?
The construction makes it difficult and no physical measure is absolute. It raises the effort well above peeling a normal sticker, which is what it is for.
Does it stop someone copying my tag?
No. Copying reads the content and writes it elsewhere, which does not touch your tag. Only a chip that authenticates cryptographically addresses copying.
Can I reuse one that came off?
No. Removal breaks the antenna, and that is the mechanism rather than a defect.
Are they worth it for product authentication?
They prove the tag has not moved, which is part of the problem. Proving the product is genuine needs an authenticating chip and a server that checks it.